I think it’s important to divide the topic into two issues, the policies that cause short-run fluctuations and the policies that impact long-run growth. Generally speaking, I try to avoid guessing games about what is happening today and tomorrow (or even yesterday), and instead focus on the policies that will boost the economy’s underlying productive capacity. ...the Fed’s easy-money policy was a mistake. If the central bank had behaved appropriately, we presumably would not have suffered a financial crisis and recession. And if we go back in history, we find the Fed’s fingerprints whenever there is an economic meltdown. ...I would not want the government to impose a gold standard. Competitive markets should determine the form of money and/or what backs up that money. Perhaps gold would emerge in such a competitive system, but a gold standard should not be imposed. ...I don’t trust politicians. They would pass a bill to impose a VAT while simultaneously phasing out the income tax over a five-year period. But inevitably there would be some sort of “emergency” in year three and the income tax would be “temporarily” extended. When the dust settled, temporary would become permanent and we would be a decrepit European-style welfare state. ...There are many great economists, but for my line of work, Milton Friedman has to be at the top of the list. He had an incredible ability to explain the benefits of liberty and the costs of statism in a way that reached average people.
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
A Wide-Ranging Interview Covering Everything from the Gold Standard to the Value-Added Tax
The Free Market Mojo site asked me a number of interesting questions about public policy. I'm not sure all of my answers were interesting, but here are some snippets that capture my curmudgeonly outlook.
Labels:
Federal Reserve,
Gold Standard,
Milton Friedman,
news appearance,
VAT
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment